
281
ENSI Erfahrungs- und Forschungsbericht 2011
duced precipitation over the tropical Atlantic and
a northward shift of the significant mid- and high-
latitude changes in precipitation.
Overall, the different ocean surface forcings for
LGM1 and LGM2 do not fundamentally alter the
large-scale precipitation anomaly patterns com-
pared to PI, even though the impact on winter
SATs is strong. The main difference between the
simulations is a modulation of the amplitude in
several regions, e.g. in the Nordic Seas. The effect
of the changed radiative forcing in MWLGM glob-
ally affects SATs and also the precipitation in the
tropics, but it is not possible to directly address its
impact on the precipitation in the North Atlantic
region as the major differences seen in this region
can be at least partly related to changes in the
ocean surface.
b) Sensitivity to ice sheet height
The impacts of the topography, i.e., the height of
the ice sheets, on the atmospheric dynamics and
the precipitation pattern are investigated using the
four MW sensitivity simulations (MWLIN, MWEU,
MWUS and MWNS). The comparison of these re-
sults to the sensitivity to ocean surface or radiative
forcing changes enables us to categorize the pro-
cesses with respect to their relevance in being re-
sponsible for precipitation changes over Europe.
As the mean altitude in the MW simulations is re-
duced compared to the LGM topography (due to
the lowering of the ice sheets), the global mean
SATs in the four simulations are slightly higher than
in MWLGM. Generally, the strongest SAT differ-
ences between the simulations are found in re-
gions where the altitudes are changed. Over the
ocean, the only significant difference between
the MW simulations is a warming (compared to
MWLGM) in winter between 40° and 50°N across
the North Atlantic that is most pronounced in
MWUS and MWNS reaching up to 8 °C.
The global mean precipitation is not affected by
the topography changes and does not significant-
ly differ in the MW simulations. Regarding win-
ter precipitation, however, a strong impact of the
height of the ice sheets is evident (Fig. 3g and i).
The band of positive precipitation anomalies in the
mid-latitudes that occurs in all three LGM topog-
raphy simulations is reduced and the reduction
is stronger the more the Laurentide ice sheet is
lowered. While the significant anomalies are only
slightly diluted in MWEU (Laurentide ice sheet
height at 76 % of the LGM value), they are strong-
ly reduced in MWLIN (height at 67 %) especially in
the eastern part and do no longer form a continu-
ous band. In MWUS and MWNS (height at 46 %)
the positive precipitation anomalies are limited to
the western part between 40°W to 70°W except
for a few small patches around Spain in MWUS.
The discrepancy between MWUS and MWNS
around Spain is attributed to internal variability,
as the difference between the two simulations is
not significant in this region. Additionally, in other
areas precipitation anomalies consistently change
with the height of the Laurentide ice sheet. A low-
er altitude of the Laurentide ice sheet corresponds
to a precipitation increase over the eastern part
of its slope, in the Labrador Sea and in the North
Atlantic at 20°N. The impact of the Fennoscandi-
an ice sheet is less pronounced and mainly affects
the precipitation at its southeastern slope of the
ice sheet. There, the precipitation is significantly
increased in the simulations with a lowered alti-
tude of the Fennoscandian ice sheet compared to
MWLGM while no significant changes are found
for MWUS and MWNS.
For summer precipitation the differences between
the four simulations are much smaller and not sig-
nificant for most regions (Fig. 3h and j). The few
significant changes point to a similar but much
weaker impact of the Laurentide ice sheet as in the
winter with increased precipitation in the high-lat-
itudes and a band of reduced precipitation across
the Atlantic compared to MWLGM, but overall
the anomaly patterns are similar for all MW sim-
ulations.
Analyzing the MW simulations indicates a strong
impact of the topography on the winter precipi-
tation pattern. For most of the anomalies in the
North Atlantic region the height of the Lauren-
tide ice sheet is identified as the dominant factor.
Together with the changed winter SATs over the
North Atlantic – even though the lower boundary
forcing is the same – the results suggest a change
of the atmospheric dynamics.
Importance of the atmospheric dynamics
To investigate the impact of the boundary condi-
tions on the synoptic scale variability in our simu-
lations two different methods are considered: an
Eulerian measure, which is defined as the band-
pass filtered (2.5–6 days) standard deviation of the
500 hPa geopotential height [6] and a Lagrang-
Komentáře k této Příručce